Black Crawling Systems Archive Release 1.0/Black Crawling Systems Archive Release 1.0 (L0pht Heavy Industries, Inc.)(1997).ISO/tezcat/Beter/Beter49

Internet Message Format | 1996-07-07 | 46KB

From the Radio Free Michigan archives

ftp://141.209.3.26/pub/patriot

If you have any other files you'd like to contribute, e-mail them to
[e-mail].
------------------------------------------------

This is the Dr. Beter AUDIO LETTER(R), Box 16428, Ft. Worth, Texas
76133

   Hello, my friends, this is Dr. Beter. Today is August 27, 1979, and
this is my AUDIO LETTER(R) No. 49. As I say these words, the slow,
lazy days of summer 1979 are drawing to a close. Most of us are sorry
to see them go. For many people summer is a time to ignore the outside
world as much as possible. It's time to relax, to bask in the sun, to
pretend that today will blend into tomorrow without change or trouble.
Television news programs in these later days of August have been
filled with items that reinforce this mood. Even the alleged President
has seemingly found time to lay aside the tedium of doing his job, and
for a week or more we were assured by television reports that the
Carter robotoid family were enjoying a tranquil steamboat ride down
the Mississippi River. To all appearances, this robotoid President has
had nothing to do except jog around the boat deck, shake hands with
well-wishers, and give the same Energy speech over and over. If he can
take life that easy, we think, why shouldn't we relax too? But, my
friends, at this very moment the world is in ferment as never before.

   If you depend on television news and newspaper headlines as most
people do, the world may seem to be just rolling along just like Old
Man River; but if you want to have some hint of what is really taking
place today, you should listen to the short-wave radio. Get into the
habit of listening to the BBC World Service, to Radio Moscow World
Service, to Radio Australia, to Radio South Africa, even Radio Canada
right next door to us. It often contains important reports which you
will never hear through our domestic major media. You might even tune
in the Voice of America once in a while--there, too, you may hear
things you will never hear in our domestic news media, and without
commercials. But, my friends, you should listen to these with a
certain amount of charity for they all have their own biases. There is
not enough time in this entire tape even to list all the important
areas of ferment in our world; but for a moment let me just skim the
surface for you, then ask yourself whether the slick major media image
of our country and the world is real or artificial.

   Not long ago the Boat People from Vietnam were filling our
headlines. Vietnam was expelling large numbers of its people--most all
of them were Chinese, not Vietnamese. Vietnam has become a client
state of Russia, and is preparing for possible all-out war with China.
Of all countries, Vietnam knows the dangers of internal strife at this
time, and so all those who refuse to cooperate with the present regime
are being rounded up and expelled in one way or another. Vietnam is in
a hurry because already tensions are building again along the border
with China.

   The Boat People now constitute a refugee problem of staggering
proportions. Hundreds of thousands of people are crammed into refugee
camps. Even so, the recent actions of Vietnam should be placed in
proper perspective. In 35 years of continuous war in Indochina, the
mass expulsion of political undesirables is a new phenomenon. In the
past, the actions of the former Pol Pot regime in Cambodia, now known
as Kampuchea, would have been more typical. When the Chinese-backed
Pol Pot regime took control of Cambodia several years ago, a reign of
terror began. It was alleged that more than a million Cambodians were
murdered by their own government. Most of them were members of the
middle class, regardless of their ethnic background. In that way the
Pol Pot regime broke the back of any possible resistance. If the
present regime in Vietnam were carrying on according to these
traditional methods, there would be no Boat People--instead, there
would be only mass graves throughout Vietnam. There would be no
television pictures of pathetic refugees crammed into boats, and there
would be no controversy over Vietnam's actions; because, at most, all
we would hear would be a few passing rumors--then, all would be quiet
again.

   The shift in Vietnam's behavior, my friends, is the result of
Russian pressure. Since the end of the Vietnam war, all remaining
Chinese influence in Vietnam has been rooted out. Vietnam is now
purely a Russian client state; and like Russia herself, Vietnam is
getting rid of internal enemies by expelling them. As for the bloody
Pol Pot regime in Cambodia, that was recently overthrown by the
Vietnamese invasion.

   The ferment in Indo-China is visible elsewhere too. Recently the
United States has started speeding up arms shipments to Thailand, but
the United States Government is now coming under Russia's control, so
for all intents and purposes, Thailand's fate is already sealed. Soon
it, too, will enter the Russian orbit.

   Russia's continuing encirclement of China is moving right along.
Early in 1978, my friends, I alerted you to watch for America's doors
to start opening wide to Red China. Within a few months the news was
filled with comments that we had decided to play the so-called "China
card." It was all a panicky attempt by America's real rulers to buy
time against Russia. During the final months of 1977, Russia had
wrestled the military control of space away from the United States.
This had altered completely the East-West balance of power; but due to
the death of the real Leonid Brezhnev on January 7, 1978, our Rulers
thought they had a chance. They expected the Kremlin to be divided by
infighting to decide Brezhnev's successor. They thought they could
keep the Kremlin off balance for two to three years. Using that time,
they would rush ahead with secret weapons programs on a crash basis.
And so America tried to play the "China card." Before the year of 1978
was out, the Carter Administration announced that the United States
was establishing diplomatic relations with China, but it was an act of
pure desperation. The late four Rockefeller brothers had badly
underestimated the tightly knit band of Christians who now rule
Russia. Since March 1978, Marshal Dmitry Ustinov has been the top man
in the Kremlin. At the proper time he will step down in favor of a
younger man, but for now the Kremlin power structure is stable and
effective.

   Current events in Asia demonstrate an important fact. America's
attempt to play the so-called "China card" was a failure. It's no
longer fashionable even to speak in those terms. China's invasion of
Vietnam early this year of 1979 showed up the United States as a paper
tiger in Asia. By contrast, Russia's profile there is becoming taller
and taller. As I revealed long ago, China was actually playing the
"America card" to get the best deal possible with Russia. Next month,
formal talks will begin in Moscow between China and Russia toward
improving relations between the two.

   Six years ago in my book I warned about the forces leading to a
vast new Asian Axis. Today this axis built around Russia, China, and
Japan is coming together, but Russia is making sure there's no doubt
in anyone's mind about who will be its leader. Even on the eve of
major talks between Russia and China, Russia does not hesitate to
point fingers at China. For example, look at Afghanistan on Russia's
southern border which is now a Russian client state. Civil war has
been underway there for nine months. Early this month a four-hour
pitched battle took place right in the capital city of Kabul. Afghan
Radio has charged that trained guerrillas, anti-revolutionaries, have
entered Afghanistan from neighboring Iran and Pakistan; and Russia
charges that some of these intruders were trained in China.

   In ways like this, my friends, Russia is putting pressure not only
on China but also on Pakistan and Iran. This is part of Russia's
preoccupation with bordering states, which I have explained in the
past. Afghanistan and Iran both border on Russia, and Russia wants
secure borders. Pakistan is a land bridge from Afghanistan to the
Arabian Sea. Russia has historically wanted a land corridor in this
area for access to the Indian Ocean. In other ways too, Pakistan is
being given good reason to think over her attitude toward Russia.

   Lately Pakistan's relations with the United States have taken a
turn for the worse. Earlier this month, on August 11, the New York
Times made public some stunning policy planning within the State
Department. Pakistan is very close to creating its own atomic bomb,
but the Times revealed that the United States intends to stop Pakistan
one way or another. One of the options under specific consideration
has brought a stinging protest by Pakistan--and no wonder. That option
is: covert operations. That, my friends, is exactly the option used by
the United States in Guyana last November. In the case of Pakistan,
those operations would involve sabotage of her atomic installations.
Here at home, of course, sabotage is supposed to be inconceivable.

   All across the world, the ferment increasingly has the flavor of
dramatic change. For example, less than a decade ago the United States
supported Pakistan in the war with India; and for five years now India
has had the atomic bomb--but now, the United States reportedly wants
to stop Pakistan from getting it. But things have changed, my friends.
The Rockefellers a decade ago were at the peak of their power. India
was slated for conquest in a plan which later ousted Indira Gandhi
from power. But as I have revealed in recent tapes, the four
Rockefeller brothers are no more. Their old allies who overthrew them,
the atheistic Bolsheviks, have also been stopped in their tracks. It
is now Russia who controls most all of the top echelons of the United
States Government; and as Pakistan ponders a changed America, Indira
Gandhi is staging a comeback in India.

   In the past year the biggest change of all has gone unannounced in
our daily news. The end of a dynasty has taken place, the Rockefeller
dynasty. It began a year ago last month with the eldest of the four
brothers, John D. III. In AUDIO LETTER No. 36 I revealed how his death
would cause Rockefeller efforts in Africa and Asia to start
unraveling, and today the headless Rockefeller cartel is losing fast
in southern Africa. The initiative is shifting back to Britain, which
has established a special secret relationship with Russia. As for
Asia, I have already pointed out the collapse of America's so-called
"China card" strategy, notwithstanding the present visit to China of
the robotoid Mondale.

   Turning to the Persian Gulf, we keep hearing about United States
plans for a large contingency force. This force, known as the "Quick
Reaction Corps", would rush to the Gulf to protect our oil lifeline in
time of crisis; but throughout the Gulf region itself, this plan has
raised cries of protest. It's an offshoot of the plan I made public a
year ago to set up an American first strike against Russia; but even
without knowing that, it's obvious to everyone that the force would
mean trouble. Kuwait has already served notice in public that the
United States must not deploy these forces in the Gulf. If we do,
Kuwait will destroy her own oil wells.

   At this time last year the Shah of Iran was still in power, but the
upheaval in Iran which was tied to the secret American war plan ended
his rule earlier this year. The revolution in Iran was also designed
to break the access by British Petroleum to Iranian oil. That has left
practically the whole pie to the Rockefeller big oil cartel; but
increasingly the Khomeini regime has turned out to be an awkward
puppet for big oil. Now Iran is becoming destabilized by internal
strife among Kurds, Arabs, and leftist Iranians; and lately there have
been huge demonstrations in Iran favoring the Palestine Liberation
Organization. The Iranian demonstrations have also been against Israel
and the United States, as if the two were one. Meanwhile Israeli
artillery continues to pound southern Lebanon almost daily, and yet
there's been an obvious shift in America's Middle East policy. Several
weeks ago Israeli Foreign Minister Dayan said publicly that a shift
had taken place recently. There were official denials but now the
Andrew Young affair has created a bombshell for United States policy
in the Middle East, and here at home smoldering tensions between
Blacks and Jews have been fanned into open flames.

   And so it goes, my friends. Wherever you look you will see the
ferment of change. One way to look at this is to tell yourself that
all these things are unrelated just as they are presented in the news.
Viewed in that way, world events are impossible to understand or even
remember. That's the attitude that says: There's no cause for human
events, they just happen. But, my friends, there is a cause for
everything we see. The sun does not rise every day by
accident--there's a reason for it; and the world is not stirring with
the winds of change by accident--there's a reason for it. This month,
as always, I want to focus your attention on the reasons behind
current events. Knowing these, you can better understand the
individual events in the news for yourself. Maybe you can't always
affect these events directly, but it's always better to be aware than
to be taken by surprise; and for those who are not aware, there will
be many surprises in these days of radical changes.

   My three special topics this month are:

Topic #1--RUSSIA'S TRANSFORMATION OF AMERICA'S MIDDLE EAST POLICY
Topic #2--THE DOMESTIC FALLOUT OF THE ANDREW YOUNG AFFAIR Topic
#3--RUSSIA'S TWO-FRONT WAR AGAINST ROTHSCHILD WORLD POWER.

Topic #1--One summer night in 1974 I was in the studios of a New York
City radio station. The station was WMCA, the program was the famous
LONG JOHN NEBEL SHOW. For quite some time the late Long John Nebel had
been having me on his program as a guest once a month for about six
hours. But that night I was asked a question about the Middle East. In
my answer I said among other things that the troubles there began with
the Palestinians and the Israelis, and they will end with the
Palestinians and Israelis. Now many Zionist listeners were shocked to
hear these words. For them, the Palestinians did not exist; and since
that night I have never again been allowed to appear on WMCA or any
other New York radio station. The then owner of WMCA is now the head
of the VOICE OF AMERICA. Can you imagine?

   It has now been five years since I said those forbidden words about
the Palestinians. Today, as then, the Zionists here and in Israel
bristle with hostility at the very word "Palestinian"; and for most of
those five years, American policy toward the Palestinians has echoed
that of Zionists and of Israel.

   Four years ago, in 1975, Israel was secretly guaranteed that this
policy would continue by the late Secretary of State Henry Kissinger.
This policy was never passed on by Congres s. As recently as last
March 26, 1979, American policy was still to exclude the Palestinians.
On that day the so-called "Egyptian-Israeli Peace Treaty" was signed
in Washington. It did not amend this 1975 policy in any way, and so it
continued to lock out the Palestinians.

   In AUDIO LETTER No. 44 I explained how this secret policy was
intended to lead very quickly not to peace but to war in the Middle
East. That in turn was to lead to an American nuclear first strike
against Russia. The secret American plan, which I made public one year
ago this month in AUDIO LETTER No. 37, was moving fast, but since that
time dramatic changes have been taking place in America's foreign
policy. This includes our foreign policy in general and our Middle
East policy in particular. The changes began last April 1979 behind
the scenes. At that time the changes were not yet visible to the
public, but that month I reported to my listeners that a secret war of
"doubles" had broken out in Washington. The Intelligence Agencies of
Russia, Britain, and Israel were struggling for control of the United
States Government. Our own CIA was in disarray. The CIA had always
been David Rockefeller's private detective agency, but by then David
Rockefeller was dead, replaced by a "double." Rockefeller power in
America had been shattered. In AUDIO LETTER No. 45 I reported that
Russia was gaining the upper hand in the war of "doubles." The
following month I was able to reveal why they were winning. I also
reported that two supersecret diplomatic shuttles to the Middle East
had taken place. The shuttles involved what appeared to be top
American officials, but it was actually a Russian operation to stop
the Middle East war plan. And that was only the first step in Russia's
plan to revolutionize United States policy in the Middle East.

   Many of my listeners seem to have ignored the detailed report I
gave on these shuttles in AUDIO LETTER No. 46. For one thing, there
was no hint about these developments in the major media news at that
time; and if anything, the Middle East appeared to be on the back
burner. But I think the significance of the shuttles may have been
overlooked by many people for another reason. AUDIO LETTER No. 46 was
the tape in which I first revealed Russia's secret weapon--that is,
"Organic Robotoids." These artificial, living, robot-like creatures
are shocking and mind-boggling. Their mere existence is a hard fact to
absorb; so when I described their use in the shuttles later in the
tape, it may have sounded minor by comparison. My friends, the events
of recent days regarding the Middle East are the direct result of
those shuttles! They initiated a radical shift in America's Middle
East policy because that policy is now being established by the
Kremlin. I would urge you to go back and listen again to what you
heard in AUDIO LETTER No. 46, especially regarding the Middle East
shuttles, then the events of recent days should be much easier for you
to understand.

   On June 18, 1979, the SALT II signing took place in Vienna,
Austria. America's turnabout in favor of SALT II is another aspect of
Russia's take-over here. I have discussed that in recent tapes; but on
the same day as the SALT II signing, another important meeting took
place in Vienna. The robotoid replacement for Secretary of State Cyrus
Vance met with Austria's Chancellor, Bruno Kreisky. Kreisky is a Jew;
but like many Jews, he has no sympathy with the political force known
as Zionism. In the recent past, he has made scalding attacks on the
ruling circles in Israel. In public statements about this, Kreisky has
used words such as "paranoid", "a police state", to describe the
Israeli government. The tough band of Christians who now rule Russia
agree completely. Like Kreisky, the Russians have often made public
statements blasting Zionism. In Topic #3 I'll say more about the
controversy over Zionism because this controversy is now moving onto
center stage in a struggle over the future of all mankind.

   In the Kreisky meeting with the Vance robotoid, the diplomatic
status of the Palestinians was discussed. Ten days earlier, United
States Ambassador to Austria, Milton Wolf, had already had a meeting
with the representative of the PLO. Kreisky said he intended to invite
Arafat, the PLO leader, for a formal visit to Vienna. In that way,
Kreisky would be initiating a quasi-official recognition of the PLO as
a political force. On July 8 Arafat arrived in Vienna, creating
headlines in Europe. Meanwhile, there had already been three meetings
in Austria between United States Ambassador Wolf and a PLO
representative. On July 31 a Jimmy Carter robotoid began setting the
stage for the Andrew Young affair. In an interview, robotoid Carter
compared the Palestinian problem to the Civil Rights movement in the
United States. For days Israeli leaders were boiling, and their
sympathizers in this country denounced the Carter remarks. On August
5, Israeli Foreign Minister Dayan complained publicly that in the past
two months or so, quote: "There has been a shift in United States
policy." That shift, my friends, began with the secret robotoid
shuttles, which I revealed three months ago. On August 13, special
Middle East Envoy, Robert Strauss, or rather a Strauss robotoid, spoke
before the American Bar Association in Dallas. He said the United
States is committed to the security of Israel but also, quote: "the
legitimate rights of the Palestinian people." The same day, the Andrew
Young affair began. NEWSWEEK magazine broke the story that Young, as
Ambassador to the United Nations, had met with the UN observer of the
PLO, Zehdi Terzi. The next day the Israeli government loudly protested
Young's action. The day after that, August 15, he resigned.

   Last month I alerted you to watch for more changing faces in
positions of power here in the United States. The departure of Andrew
Young is part of this "changing of the guard", but it's also much
more. For one thing, the Young affair has highlighted the fact that
America's Middle East policy is changing, and it did so in a way that
cast the Palestinians in a far more favorable light than in the past.
Equally important to Russia, Israel has been lured into giving itself
a black eye. In the past, Israel could always claim that the PLO was
making peace impossible, but now the PLO is concentrating on a
diplomatic drive for a peaceful accommodation with Israel. Israel's
response has been to try to sabotage this process. World-wide the
reaction has been to start questioning whether Israel really wants
peace. For example, on August 17, the BBC carried an interview with
Antony McDermott of the Financial Times of London. He was asked his
opinion of the Israeli objective in bringing about the Young
resignation. He replied in part, quote: "I would speculate that if the
PLO were through some miracle to come out and say 'We accept the
existence of Israel', it would be extremely embarrassing to Mr. Begin
because he's constantly comparing them to the Nazis." Russia had
foreseen that Israel would try to stop the United States policy shift.
The Andrew Young affair has caused Israel to injure herself by these
efforts.

   World opinion toward Israel is changing; but for Israel, the worst
setback of all may be right here in the United States because the
domestic fallout, my friends, of the Andrew Young affair is not at all
what Israel had in mind.

Topic #2--When Israel was proclaimed a separate nation in 1947 by the
United Nations, the United States was the first great power to give it
diplomatic recognition. Ever since that time, there has been a special
relationship between the governments of the two countries. An
essential ingredient in maintaining this relationship has been
domestic support within the United States. For more than three decades
American public opinion has been generally pro-Israel, but the Andrew
Young affair is causing Israel to be seen in a different light by many
Americans. For one thing, questions are now being raised about Israeli
Intelligence activity in the United States. In the past this has never
b een a public issue, but that is changing because of the way in which
the Young affair broke wide open.

   On August 16, the day after he resigned, Young held a news
conference at the United Nations. In the words of the BBC that
evening, Young blamed Israel for the events which led to his
resignation. That same day, the Atlanta Constitution reported that
Israeli Intelligence agents had spied on Young's meeting with PLO
representative Terzi. The newspaper said that this enabled Israel to
challenge Young's original statement that the meeting had been
inadvertent. Israel's United Nations Ambassador Blum immediately
denied the report; but when Young was asked about it, he said that he
assumed he was being bugged but he did not care. Since then reports
have continued to multiply about Israeli spying in the Young episode.

   Israeli denials have just led to increasingly detailed reports
about the spying, and in the process broader questions are being asked
about Israeli spying here in the United States. All this is very
worrisome to the government of Israel because they have, my friends,
left a trail. The fact is that the Mossad, Israel's Intelligence
Agency, is very active in the United States, but this is in violation
of a secret agreement under which the Mossad is forbidden from this
activity. In return, our own CIA is forbidden from the clandestine
activities in Israel. Strangely enough, I can report that the CIA has
adhered to the agreement, but both did work together in the Jonestown,
Guyana tragedy, as I revealed in AUDIO LETTER 40. Israel is fearful of
having Mossad activities here exposed as a cause celebre. Technically,
the hundreds of Mossad agents in the United States could be rounded up
and expelled. If this was done with great fanfare, the impact on
Israel's image here in America could be devastating. World opinion
would also veer away from Israel, so the Zionists are doing everything
in their power not to have an investigation. What they want most is
for the controversy to just go away. At the same time, they're trying
to put the best possible face on Israeli Intelligence. For example, on
August 21 an article appeared in the Washington Star entitled:
"Discreet Mossad called World's Best." The article is built mainly
around the statements not by Israelis but by former American
Intelligence officials. The impression conveyed is that the mighty
Mossad easily could spy on anyone it wants to, but we are also to
believe they just wouldn't do such a thing as spy on the Young-Terzi
meeting. So far though the questions about Israeli spying in the Young
affair are refusing to go away. On August 23 the Washington Star
carried a story in which an unnamed United States source is quoted as
saying: "The Israelis have staked out the Arabs around the United
Nations with bugs, taps, and surveillances. Young walked right into
it." The article says considerably more about the Young episode, then
it expands into the subject of Israeli spying here in general. For
example, quote: "According to one source, New York City is the center
of Israeli spying in the United States and has been for years."
Another quote: "On one occasion United States officials learned that
an Israeli wire tap operation was using a local synagogue as a cover."
And a final quote: "Each year in New York, moreover, there are
numerous cases in which Israeli agents have been identified posing as
FBI agents, complete with seemingly authentic credentials."

   By any standards, my friends, words like these in a major American
newspaper signal a change from the past. Controversy over Intelligence
activities could become a major fallout against Israel from the Young
affair, but there is another domestic fallout which is even more
important and that is the rupturing of political and other ties
between the Blacks and the Jews. These tensions are very real, my
friends, and have been building since the mid-sixties; but they have
only now burst into the open for all to see. The catalyst, of course,
was the Young affair. Up until now, practically the only Americans who
were aware of these tensions were the Blacks and Jews themselves, but
the strongest feelings in this rift are felt by the Blacks. They are
the ones who feel they have been wronged, so I think the easiest way
to describe the situation is in the words of Blacks themselves.

   On August 16 Young himself blamed Israel for making his resignation
necessary. The same day it was disclosed that United States Ambassador
to Austria, Milton Wolf, had met three times with PLO representatives;
but Wolf, who is Jewish, was not being reprimanded, much less forced
to resign! For Blacks, that news added insult to injury. It got still
worse the next day, August 17. It was announced that the United States
had made a surprise proposal regarding the Security Council resolution
on Palestinian Rights. The United States had asked Israel to support
an American-sponsored resolution to that effect, but without success.
With that news, Andy Young looked like nothing more than the fall guy
for a new American policy. Blacks wondered: "Why Andy? Why a Black?"
The same day, Young made comments on the NBC "Today Show" which were
repeated on the BBC World Service. Young was asked about latent
anti-Semitism in the Black community, and said, quote:

 "I think there may be a resentment of a certain kind of arrogance
that was played up, especially in the New York press; and there was a
kind of arrogance of Jewish power, headlines saying: 'Jews demand
Young's ouster.' I think that's caused the reaction by the Black
community, which is a natural reaction, but in no way does that
constitute anti-Semitism."

   The following day, August 18, an article in the New York Daily News
illustrated the growing reaction of Black America. The article was by
Black columnist Earl Caldwell. It was titled: "Finally Played the
Game, and Lost." Referring to the day after Young's resignation,
Caldwell wrote, quote:

 "On Thursday, the afternoon was filled with the fallout. The clamor
for his resignation had come primarily from the Jewish community. That
is fact. And now the backlash that Andrew Young had warned the Israeli
Ambassador about was rising. Downstairs on the steps of the Mission
the Rev. Jesse Jackson was saying that Andrew Young was the fall guy,
and that it was not the Klan that brought the Bakke case, that it was
not the Klan that deals with Southern Africa, and that it was not the
Klan that brought the pressure to fire Andrew Young; it was our former
allies. And the backlash was building." (End of quote from the Earl
Caldwell column.)

   The rift between Blacks and Jews is continuing to grow, my friends.
Already a group of Black ministers of the Southern Christian
Leadership Conference has held a meeting with Palestinians, and they
have announced their support for Palestinian rights. And during the
past several days, a series of very powerful commentaries about the
situation were carried over the American Forces Radio and TV Service.
The commentator was James Rowe of the Mutual Black Network. Unlike
most other programs on the American Forces Radio, the Rowe
commentaries are followed by a disclaimer originating with the Mutual
Black Network; but they are being beamed straight to our troops here
and overseas. And, of course, our Armed Forces of today have a very
high proportion of Blacks, here and abroad.

   The Rowe commentaries on the Young affair are instructive for two
reasons. For one thing, they illustrate the growing backlash by many
Blacks against Israel, but also Rowe reminds his listeners of some
historical background facts which  must be taken into account. Most
Americans, Black or otherwise, do not remember this background, or at
least do not think about it. In his commentary four days ago, August
23, Rowe began, quote:

 "It's time the United States stopped placating the Israelis and got
down to the serious business of negotiating Peace in the Middle East.
Every time something offends Israel, the Jewish American population
rises up. They expect Black Americans to support them, despite the
refusal of Jewish groups to support some of our most recent concerns.
The Jewish groups left us when it came to reverse discrimination.
Despite that, what is more important is RIGHT and WRONG. It is wrong
that we support an ethnic group when they are mistaken, and Israel is
mistaken in the treatment of the Palestinians. We cannot continue to
pay for Hitler's mistakes. Israel cannot be permitted to perpetrate
upon another group of people what the Germans tried to do to them in
World War II. If Israel has a right to exist, then so does the State
of Palestine. The goal now should be: How do we achieve that?"

Further on, Rowe said:

 "The United States Ambassador to Austria was not asked to resign
although he had several meetings with the PLO representatives. So why
did Andrew Young have to resign? Why did the first black United States
Ambassador have to become the fall guy in a plan to appease Jerusalem
and the Jewish lobby here? It is extremely complicated and much
greater than concerns for oil from the region."

The next day, August 24, James Rowe had more to say about the Young
resignation, and he included some history in very concise terms.
Here's an excerpt from his commentary; quote:

 "We cannot let ourselves go on the defensive every time the Jewish
American lobby criticizes Blacks as anti-Semitic because we don't
agree with them. Anybody that doesn't agree with Israel's hard line
stand is considered anti-Semitic in Jerusalem. If anyone is to be
charged with responsibility for the current crisis in the Middle East,
it should be Great Britain. And if anyone is to be charged with the
protracted conflict in that region of the world, it is to be Israel.
Britain had control over the land that made up Jordan and Palestine
under a League of Nations' mandate. The British wanted to end their
colonialism there, and permitted Zionists to move in uncontrolled, and
left the Palestinians to the Jordanians. The Palestinians were left
without a home because London did not follow through on the United
Nations' recommendation of creating two separate states--one for the
Israelis and one for the Palestinians. It appears Israel wants the
Palestinians completely removed from the scene. Now comes the Andrew
Young card. How does the United States support the human rights of the
Palestinians without offending our long-time and hard-line friends in
the Zionist movement? The United States is faced with supporting the
human rights of the Palestinians--but to the offense of Jews. Perhaps
Andy Young was the test of how offended Israel would be if America
decided to give in to demands from the Palestine Liberation
Organization." (End of quotation from the Rowe commentary of August
24.)

  My friends, there was nothing accidental about the Young affair. To
those who do not know about Russia's secret take-over here in
Washington, it all looks like a big mistake; but in reality Israel's
mighty Mossad has just been out-foxed by Russia's KGB. The Russians,
through the robotoids in the White House, control most all the top
positions in the United States Government. They brought about the
Young-Terzi meeting of July 26, and in doing so they knew it would be
monitored by Israeli Intelligence. The Russians succeeded in planning
and guiding events in a way beneficial to Russia.

   In AUDIO LETTER 46, I mentioned that Prime Minister Begin of Israel
had been replaced with a robotoid, as had Sadat of Egypt. Wholesale
robotizing is not taking place in those countries. By using their
Begin robotoid, Russia was able to make sure that Israel's policy
would be to make an issue of Young's PLO contact. This action has
caused the backlash reactions against Israel which I have already
discussed. It has also enhanced the image of the Palestinians
internationally. In addition, the Young flap provides an excuse for
the United States to back into a more favorable treatment of the
Palestinian cause. But, my friends, there will be other manipulated
events to distract you from the Andrew Young affair, all created by
friends of Israel still in our United States State Department.

   The Russian target in the Andrew Young affair appears at first
glance to be all the Jews in both Israel and the United States, but
that is not the case. The true target in these Kremlin maneuvers is
the political force called ZIONISM. Many Jews are not Zionists, and
there are also Zionists who are not Jews; but Zionism masquerades as a
movement that speaks for all Jews. For reasons I will discuss in Topic
#3, the Christ-ones who rule Russia today intend to utterly break
Zionism as a force in the world. A major part of this is to be the
dismantling of Zionist power here in America. To that end, the Andrew
Young affair was engineered to uncork the political pressures between
Jews and Blacks. On the surface, this appears to mean all Jews; but
the commentaries I quoted by James Rowe suggest that already the focus
is narrowing. Black leaders are looking around carefully; and as they
look at the Zionists, they are doing so with frowns and narrowed eyes.

Topic #3--It has now been nearly two years since I first made public
the overthrow of the Bolsheviks in Russia; and as my older listeners
know, this is the outcome of six decades of struggle by a tightly knit
band of native Russian Christians. Now they are out to destroy
Bolshevism world-wide. The Kremlin's campaign to wipe out Bolshevism
is still a secret officially; but as important as Bolshevism is, the
Kremlin rulers regard it as just one major tentacle of a giant
serpent; and if they keep their anti-Bolshevism secret, they make no
bones about their opposition to what they see as another tentacle.
That tentacle is ZIONISM.

   The origins of modern-day Zionism trace back to the late 19th
Century, but the first major milestone toward the creation of a Jewish
state happened in 1917. Great Britain was looking for all the friends
she could find in what was then called "The Great War." That year the
United States was drawn into that war with the deliberate help of
President Woodrow Wilson. But that same year, Russia was removed from
the war against Germany by the Bolshevik Revolution. So the Allies
were still under great pressure; and in order to enlist the growing
power of the Zionist movement on the side of Britain, the famous
Balfour Declaration was announced. Lord Balfour announced that Britain
would look with favor on the creation of a national home for the
Jewish people in Palestine. Most Americans were too preoccupied with
news of the war to think long about the Balfour Declaration in
Britain; but soon after the war ended, a major protest was published
against the plans of the Zionists. On March 5, 1919, readers of the
New York Times saw a long PETITION on page 7 with the headline:
"PROTEST TO PRESIDENT WILSON AGAINST ZIONIST STATE." Nowadays if we
saw a headline like that, most of us would probably pay little
attention. We would assume that it was the work of the Arabs and turn
the page; but that 1919 protest was presented and signed exclusively
by Jews. And these were not some small splinter group of malcontents,
they were a galaxy of Jewish stars in American politics, education,
law, business, medicine, journalism, banking, as well as prominent
rabbis; people like Congressman Julius Kahn of California who headed
the list; Henry Morganthau, Sr., ex-Ambassador to Turkey; Simon Wolf,
former consul to Egypt; Max Senior, former president of the National
Conference of Jewish Charities; Professor Morris Jastrow of the
University of Pennsylvania; Adolph Ochs, publisher of the New York
Times; Lessing Rosenthal, Chicago attorney; Dr. Julius Rosenstein,
surgeon at Mount Zion Hospital in San Francisco; L. H. Kampner, mayor
of Galveston, Texas; I. W. Hellman, president of the Union Trust
Company in San Francisco; and many others.

   The PETITION begins, quote:

  "As a future form of government for Palestine will undoubtedly be
considered by the approaching Peace Conference, we, the undersigned
citizens of the United States, unite in this statement setting forth
our objections to the organization of a Jewish State in Palestine as
proposed by the Zionist societies in this country and Europe."

The petitioners felt that they were, quote:"voicing the opinion of
the majority of American Jews." To back that up, they pointed out,
quote:

  "The American Zionists represent, according to the most recent
statistics available, only a small proportion of the Jews living in
this country, about 150,000 out of 3-1/2 million."

As their source, they cited the 1918 edition of the "American Jewish
Yearbook" in Philadelphia.

The PETITION goes on to sound not only a protest but a series of
warnings. The signers did sympathize with the concept of, quote: "A
refuge in Palestine or elsewhere." They felt that this would be a good
thing purely as a haven for Jews living under oppression; but they
were bitterly opposed to the Zionist demands for, quote:
"Reorganization of the Jews as a national unit to whom now or in the
future territorial sovereignty in Palestine shall be committed."

   The Jews who published that PETITION against a Zionist State 60
years ago turned out to be prophets. Like most prophets, their
warnings went unheeded; but for more than three decades events in the
Middle East have been acting out their warnings in flesh, blood, and
tragedy.

   I can do no more than highlight a few points from the anti-Zionist
PETITION, which is long and detailed, but history demands that we be
aware of the efforts of the anti-Zionist Jews to turn aside tragedy,
deep tragedy. They pointed out that the Zionists were demanding,
quote:

  "A home not merely for Jews living in countries in which they are
oppressed, but for Jews universally. No Jew, wherever he may live, can
consider himself free from the implications of such a grant."

   From a practical standpoint, my friends, they pointed out that tiny
Palestine could not hold all the Jews then living in the world. The 6
to 10 million in Russia and Romania alone would have produced hopeless
overcrowding; but beyond that, they objected to what they termed
"political segregation." They felt it was both undemocratic and
dangerous to Jews themselves the world over. They worried, quote:

  "All Jews repudiate every suspicion of a double allegiance; but to
our minds, it is necessarily implied in, and cannot by any logic be
eliminated from, the establishment of a sovereign state for the Jews
in Palestine."

They added that, quote:

  "As a rule, those who favor such a restoration advocate it not for
themselves but for others. Those who act thus and yet insist on their
patriotic attachment to the countries of which they are citizens are
self-deceived in their profession of Zionism."

They were worried that Jews themselves would be torn internally by
pressures for double allegiance, and they were concerned that this
would play into the hands of those who considered Jews, quote:

  "Aliens in every land, incapable of true patriotism, and prompted
only by sinister and self-seeking motives."

   Quoting Sir George Adam Smith, an authority of that day on
Palestine, they also foresaw the bloodshed to come, quote:

  "It is not true that Palestine is the national home of the Jewish
people and of no other people. It is not correct to call its
non-Jewish inhabitants Arabs, or to say that they have left no image
of their spirit and made no history except in the great mosque; nor
can we evade the fact that Christian communities have been as long in
the possession of their portion of this land as ever the Jews were."

   The PETITION also says, quote:

  "The claims to various sections of this undefined territory would
unquestionably evoke bitter controversies. To subject the Jews to the
possible recurrence of such bitter and sanguinary conflict, which
would be inevitable, would be a crime."

Finally, they concluded with the words:

  "We do not wish to see Palestine, either now or at any time in the
future, organized as a Jewish State."

But, my friends, the Zionists were successful in thwarting this appeal
by prominent American Jews. Israel became a nation in 1947, and the
predicted bloodshed began immediately. Israeli terrorism by Menachem
Begin and others caused Palestinian blood to run red in the streets.
Palestinians became refugees in their own land, and the borders of
Israel began expanding. Soon there was nothing left of what had been
called Palestine.

   The Middle East war plan, which the Russians halted in May 1979,
involved the Zionists in alliance with the Bolsheviks. The Russians
are determined to end the threat of nuclear war; and after 30 years of
Israeli history, they have concluded the same thing about Zionism as
about Bolshevism. They are convinced that there will be no peace in
the world for Jew, Moslem, or Christian so long as Zionism exists. So
they are now in a two-front war to destroy both Zionism and
Bolshevism.

   Long ago Russia's new rulers discovered that Zionism and Bolshevism
had common origins. These origins involved the ROTHSCHILDS, but others
are involved also, so they are now following the trail of Satanic
power towards its origins using their secret weapons--the robotoids.
Right now they are striking at the tentacles of world power, like
ZIONISM and BOLSHEVISM; but when the time is ripe, they are hoping to
strike at the very head of world Satanic power.

   Until next month, God willing, this is Dr. Beter. Thank you, and
may God bless each and every one of you.
------------------------------------------------
(This file was found elsewhere on the Internet and uploaded to the
Radio Free Michigan site by the archive maintainer.

 All files are ZIP archives for fast download.

 E-mail [e-mail])